Exploring experiential meaning in Masoud Pezeshkian's speech at the 79th session United Nations General Assembly

Maharani, Zahra Dwi (2025) Exploring experiential meaning in Masoud Pezeshkian's speech at the 79th session United Nations General Assembly. Sarjana thesis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Preview	Text (COVER) 1_cover.pdf Download (97kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ABSTRAK) 2_abstrak.pdf Download (108kB) | Preview
Preview	Text 3_skbebasplagiarism (5).pdf Download (95kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (DAFTAR ISI) 4_daftarisi.pdf Download (100kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (BAB I) 5_bab1.pdf Download (147kB) | Preview
	Text (BAB II) 6_bab2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (239kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB III) 7_bab3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (207kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB IV) 8_bab4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (609kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB V) 9_bab5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (110kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 10_daftarpustaka.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (180kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study analyzes Masoud Pezeshkian’s speech at the 79th session United Nations General Assembly by using Halliday’s transitivity framework to understand the experiential meaning behind his words. The speech was examined through a qualitative descriptive approach. It contains 193 clauses, which include 564 transitivity elements: 297 participants (52.65%), 206 processes (36.52%), and 61 circumstances (10.81%). Material processes were the most common, followed by relational, mental, verbal, and behavioral processes, while no existential processes were found. The speech contains 297 participants, with goal appearing most frequently, followed by actor, phenomenon, senser, token, value, attribute, carrier, sayer, receiver, verbiage, target, behaver, beneficiary-recipient, recipient-client, and behavior. The most common circumstances were cause and manner, followed by place, time, role, accompaniment, and matter. The research concludes that the speech conveys five main experiential meanings: criticism of Israel, global injustice and inequality, Iran’s commitment to peace and diplomacy, support for Palestinian rights, and criticism of sanctions against Iran.

Actions (login required)

View Item