Religiusitas dan Intensi Anti Korupsi: Peran Moderasi Kebersyukuran
Abstract
Corruption is a behavior that cannot be socially or religiously justified. Interestingly, despite the corruption is prohibited in all religions in Indonesia, the index of corruption remains high as reported by the results of surveys of national and international institutions. Besides, research on this matter showed inconsistency in the relationships between religiosity and corrupt behavior. This research re-examined the relationship between religiosity and anti-corruption intentions and determined the moderating effect of gratitude as an intervening variable. Gratitude is one of the strongest religious values which is expected to reduce ones’ intention to do corruptions. The research was conducted using a correlational research design, involving 92 population in an educational foundation in Garut regency, West Java. Data were collected using the GRAT short form to measure gratitude and the Muslim Religiosity Scale (MRC) was employed to measure religiosity. Whereas, Anti-Corruption Intention Scale was used to measure the anti-corruption intention. The results of data analysis showed that religiosity and anti-corruption intentions were positively correlated (F= 154.1, p = .001, R2= .631), and gratitude moderated the increase in the relationship (R2= .668). Therefore, gratitude was regarded as an intervening variable that strengthened the correlation between religiosity and anti-corruption behavior by 3.7%.
References
Abdulkareem, M., Zuhaira, M., & Ye-Zhuang, T. (2017). The Effect of Religious Beliefs, Participation and Values on Corruption: Survey Evidence from Iraq. Dalam IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (Vol. 8, Nomor 8).
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (2005). From Dispositions to Actions. Dalam T. Manstead (Ed.), Attitudes, Personality and Behavior (hlm. 41–70). McGraw-Hill Education.
al-Bukhari, M. bin I. (2015). Shahih al-Bukhari. Darul Kitab al-‘Ilmiyah.
Ancok, D., Suroso, F., & Ardani, M. (2001). Psikologi islami: Solusi islam atas problem-problem psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Azkiati Z, N. Z., Rahman, A. A., & Fahmi, I. (2019). Predict Burnout With Psychological Capital And Religious Coping. Psikis : Jurnal Psikologi Islami, 5(2), 140–145.
Bologna, J. (1993). Handbook on corporate fraud: Prevention, detection, and investigation. Butterworth-Heinemann. https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/45137091
Elcar, V. (2015). Hubungan Antara Religiositas dengan Pemahaman Terhadap Perilaku Korupsi [Thesis, UII Yogyakarta]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/1362
Emmons, R. A. (2004). The Psychology of Gratitude: An Introduction. Dalam The psychology of gratitude. (hlm. 3–16). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195150100.003.0001
Froh, J. J., Fan, J., Emmons, R. A., Bono, G., Huebner, E. S., & Watkins, P. (2011). Measuring gratitude in youth: Assessing the psychometric properties of adult gratitude scales in children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021590
Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Rand McNally.
Huntington, S. P., & Fukuyama, F. (2006). Political order in changing societies. Dalam Political Order in Changing Societies. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-1970-2-257
Ko, K., & Moon, S.-G. (2014). The relationship between religion and corruption: Are the proposed causal links empirically valid? International Review of Public Administration, 19(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2014.887353
Kompas.com. (2018). 2.357 Koruptor Berstatus PNS, Ini Detail Berdasarkan Instansi dan Daerah. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/09/13/20472451/2357-koruptor-berstatus-pns-ini-detail-berdasarkan-instansi-dan-daerah
KPK. (2017, Desember 8). Undang Undang Terkait. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/tentang-kpk/undang-undang-terkait
Lambert, N. M., Graham, S. M., Fincham, F. D., & Stillman, T. F. (2009). A changed perspective: How gratitude can affect sense of coherence through positive reframing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903157182
Rahman, A. A. (2016). Metode Penelitian Psikologi: Langkah cerdas menyelesaikan skripsi. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset-Bandung.
Rusdi, A. (2016). Syukur dalam Psikologi Islam dan Konstruksi Alat Ukurnya. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Psikologi: Kajian Empiris & Non-Empiris, 2(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.22236/JIPP-19
Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. (2018, Januari 8). APBN 2018: Total Anggaran Pendidikan Rp444,131 Triliun, Terbanyak di Kemenag Rp52,681 Triliun. https://setkab.go.id/apbn-2018-total-anggaran-pendidikan-rp444131-triliun-terbanyak-di-kemenag-rp52681-triliun/
Shadabi, L. (2013). The Impact of Religion on Corruption. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 12, 117.
Sommer, U., Bloom, P. B.-N., & Arikan, G. (2013). Does faith limit immorality? The politics of religion and corruption. Democratization, 20(2), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.650914
Sopanah, S., & Wahyudi, I. (2004). Analisa Anggaran Publik: Panduan TOT. Malang Corruption Watch (MCW) dan Yappika.
Wahyuni, Z. I., Adriani, Y., & Nihayah, Z. (2015). The Relationship between Religious Orientation, Moral Integrity, Personality, Organizational Climate, and Anti Corruption Intentions in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(10), 860–864. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2015.V5.570
Watkins, P. C. (2013). Gratitude and the Good Life: Toward a Psychology of Appreciation (2014 editi). Springer.
Yahya, K. K., Yean, T. F., Johari, J., & Saad, N. A. (2015). The Perception of Gen Y on Organizational Culture, Religiosity, and Corruption in Malaysian Public Organizations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01227-7
Zuckerman, M., Silberman, J., & Hall, J. A. (2013). The Relation Between Intelligence and Religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(4), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313497266
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
