Pendapat Murtadha Muthahhari dan Yusuf Al Qordowi tentang akad asuransi

Magi, Bahmid I (2018) Pendapat Murtadha Muthahhari dan Yusuf Al Qordowi tentang akad asuransi. Masters thesis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Preview	Text (COVER) 1_cover.pdf Download (206kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ABSTRAK) 2_ abstrak.pdf Download (167kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (DAFTAR ISI) 3_ daftar isi.pdf Download (149kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (BAB I) 4_bab1.pdf Download (600kB) | Preview
	Text (BAB II) 5_bab2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB III) 6_bab3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (875kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB IV) 7_bab4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (590kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB V) 8_bab5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (270kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 9_daftar pustaka.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (384kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Pawning (rahn) is one of an agreement which can be used in house utilization by some completed requirement.Practically, pawning (rahn) in the society of Pecet sub-district, nowadays, the house as a stuff of guarantor or marhun is taken of it utilization and pawning it again by murtahin to the other side, so thatmurtahin gets the money is not only for changing management of it marhun, but murtahin bring that house as an income from outcome of it house rent (ijarah). This research is aimed to know (1) the agreement of pawning between rohin to murtahin, (2) the law status of renting a pawning house in Pecet sub-district Sumedangbased on madzhab mufti, (3) the law status of renting a pawning house in Pecet sub-district Sumedang based on fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI/III/2002, and (4) to know the strongest opinion between madzhab mufti and DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI/III/2002. This research is qualitative research and the method used is descriptive analysis because this research explores a phenomenon which happened in the society who did the renting activity and related sides. The data collection use an observation technique, interview, and divining manual study the data analysis use the qualitative analysis technique. The result of this research show (1) the pawning agreement which is done by the society in Pecet sub-district is a usual pawning agreement, (2) madzhab mufti have different opinion about the law status of renting a pawning house. Imam Abu Hanifah is not allowed to do it, but others is allowed to do it by the requirement of time determining and the agreement of license, (3) fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 is allowed of the agreement of renting a pawning house by the requirement of the permission from house owner, (4) the result of the comparison between madzhab mufti and fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 show that, based on writer, both of opinion is same, they allowed the utilization of stuff pawning. But, in this case, fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 is more better (rajih) than madzhab mufti because it contain all the opinion of imam madzhab. Keyword: marhun utilization, house pawning. ABSTRACT Maksudin: 212.11.015. Law Status of Renting a Pawning House Pawning (rahn) is one of an agreement which can be used in house utilization by some completed requirement.Practically, pawning (rahn) in the society of Pecet sub-district, nowadays, the house as a stuff of guarantor or marhun is taken of it utilization and pawning it again by murtahin to the other side, so thatmurtahin gets the money is not only for changing management of it marhun, but murtahin bring that house as an income from outcome of it house rent (ijarah). This research is aimed to know (1) the agreement of pawning between rohin to murtahin, (2) the law status of renting a pawning house in Pecet sub-district Sumedangbased on madzhab mufti, (3) the law status of renting a pawning house in Pecet sub-district Sumedang based on fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI/III/2002, and (4) to know the strongest opinion between madzhab mufti and DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI/III/2002. This research is qualitative research and the method used is descriptive analysis because this research explores a phenomenon which happened in the society who did the renting activity and related sides. The data collection use an observation technique, interview, and divining manual study the data analysis use the qualitative analysis technique. The result of this research show (1) the pawning agreement which is done by the society in Pecet sub-district is a usual pawning agreement, (2) madzhab mufti have different opinion about the law status of renting a pawning house. Imam Abu Hanifah is not allowed to do it, but others is allowed to do it by the requirement of time determining and the agreement of license, (3) fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 is allowed of the agreement of renting a pawning house by the requirement of the permission from house owner, (4) the result of the comparison between madzhab mufti and fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 show that, based on writer, both of opinion is same, they allowed the utilization of stuff pawning. But, in this case, fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 is more better (rajih) than madzhab mufti because it contain all the opinion of imam madzhab. Keyword: marhun utilization, house pawning. ABSTRACT Maksudin: 212.11.015. Law Status of Renting a Pawning House Pawning (rahn) is one of an agreement which can be used in house utilization by some completed requirement.Practically, pawning (rahn) in the society of Pecet sub-district, nowadays, the house as a stuff of guarantor or marhun is taken of it utilization and pawning it again by murtahin to the other side, so thatmurtahin gets the money is not only for changing management of it marhun, but murtahin bring that house as an income from outcome of it house rent (ijarah). This research is aimed to know (1) the agreement of pawning between rohin to murtahin, (2) the law status of renting a pawning house in Pecet sub-district Sumedangbased on madzhab mufti, (3) the law status of renting a pawning house in Pecet sub-district Sumedang based on fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI/III/2002, and (4) to know the strongest opinion between madzhab mufti and DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI/III/2002. This research is qualitative research and the method used is descriptive analysis because this research explores a phenomenon which happened in the society who did the renting activity and related sides. The data collection use an observation technique, interview, and divining manual study the data analysis use the qualitative analysis technique. The result of this research show (1) the pawning agreement which is done by the society in Pecet sub-district is a usual pawning agreement, (2) madzhab mufti have different opinion about the law status of renting a pawning house. Imam Abu Hanifah is not allowed to do it, but others is allowed to do it by the requirement of time determining and the agreement of license, (3) fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 is allowed of the agreement of renting a pawning house by the requirement of the permission from house owner, (4) the result of the comparison between madzhab mufti and fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 show that, based on writer, both of opinion is same, they allowed the utilization of stuff pawning. But, in this case, fatwa DSN-MUI No. 25/DSN-MUI 2002 is more better (rajih) than madzhab mufti because it contain all the opinion of imam madzhab.

Actions (login required)

View Item