Representative illocutionary act used in debate event in Flat Earthers VS Scientists : Can We Trust Science?

Widyasari, Erida (2021) Representative illocutionary act used in debate event in Flat Earthers VS Scientists : Can We Trust Science? Sarjana thesis, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.

Preview	Text (COVER) 1_cover.pdf Download (48kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (ABSTRAK) 2_abstrak.pdf Download (303kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (DAFTAR ISI) 3_daftarisi.pdf Download (204kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (BAB I) 4_bab1.pdf Download (415kB) | Preview
	Text (BAB II) 5_bab2.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (562kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB III) 6_bab3.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (496kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB IV) 7_bab4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (792kB) | Request a copy
	Text (BAB V) 8_bab5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (393kB) | Request a copy
	Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA) 9_daftarpustaka.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (310kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Speaking is not only uttering words, furthermore, the speaker does an action while speaking, in linguistics it called speech act. In order to convey illocutionary act to the listener and the listener interprets the illocutionary act appropriately, both sides should pay attention to the context. The aims of this research are to find out the illocutionary act uttered by the speakers in the debate video entitled Flat Earthers VS Scientists: Can We Trust Science? which focused on the types of representative illocutionary act and how it uttered based on Searle’s theory (1969). This research used descriptive qualitative method, it focused on describing what is found in the research. In doing this research, the researcher collected the data from the debate participant’s utterances which contains representative illocutionary act. After the data collected the researcher analyzed the data finding, and then drew the conclusion. In analyzing the data, the researcher pays attention to the context and other features outside the text to determine the types or representative illocutionary act and how it uttered. From this research, the researcher found 39 utterances of stating act which conveyed directly and 6 utterances which conveyed indirectly. There are 10 utterances of concluding act which conveyed directly and 1 utterance which conveyed indirectly. 7 utterances of reporting act which conveyed directly and no utterance which conveyed indirectly.4 utterances of complaining act which conveyed directly and 4 utterances which conveyed indirectly. 7 utterances of suggesting act which conveyed directly and 1 utterance conveyed indirectly. 3 demanding act conveyed directly and 1 utterance conveyed indirectly.

Actions (login required)

View Item